Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze)

S-TIER

Coze

Intelligence Score 90/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 1M
Pricing Model Free / Open

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 87/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze) Wins

With an intelligence score of 90/100 vs 87/100, Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze) outperforms Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) by 3 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Gemini 1.5 Pro (via Coze)
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Context Window
1M 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~85-87% ~80-84%
Release Date
Feb-May 2024 Jul 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
Varies by model 60 RPM
Daily Limit
Token-based daily limits Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Very Fast ⚡ Fast
Primary Use Case
⚡ Fast Chat & Apps General Purpose
Model Size
~1.5T (estimated) 70B
Limitations
  • Daily token limits on free tier
  • Platform-specific API format
  • Bot-centric usage model
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • Visual bot/agent builder
  • Multi-model access (GPT-4o, Gemini)
  • Plugin marketplace
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons