Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
GLM-4 9B 0414
SiliconFlow
Intelligence Score
71/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
32K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
A-TIERRequesty
Intelligence Score
83/100
Context Window
262K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash Wins
With an intelligence score of 83/100 vs 71/100, inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash outperforms GLM-4 9B 0414 by 12 points.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
GLM-4 9B 0414
|
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
32K Context | 262K Context |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~65-69% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
Fixed limits for free models — exact figures require login, verify on cloud.siliconflow.cn/models | 20 RPM on free models (60 RPM for paying orgs) |
|
Daily Limit
|
Not fully published — verify on docs.siliconflow.cn | 200 requests/day (new orgs) / 1,000/day (paying orgs), shared across free models |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps |
|
Model Size
|
9B | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
GLM-4 9B 0414
vs
inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
inclusionAI Ling 3.0 Flash Sante
GLM-4 9B 0414
vs
GLM-4.5-Flash
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
GLM-4.5-Flash
GLM-4 9B 0414
vs
GLM-4.7-Flash
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
GLM-4.7-Flash
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
GLM-4.6V-Flash (vision)
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
GLM-4.5 Flash
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
GLM-4.7 Flash
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
GLM-4.6V Flash
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
Qwen3 8B
inclusionAI Ling 3.1 Flash
vs
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B