Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 128K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Google AI Studio

Intelligence Score 94/100

Context Window 1M Context, 10 RPM

Pricing Model Free / Open

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 94/100 vs 92/100, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking outperforms GPT-4o (via routing) by 2 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	GPT-4o (via routing)	Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Context Window	128K	1M Context, 10 RPM
Architecture	Transformer (Proprietary)	Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score	~85-87%	~88-91%
Release Date	May-Nov 2024	Dec 2024
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)	60 RPM	5-30 RPM (varies by model)
Daily Limit	200 requests/day (free models)	9000 RPD (Flash) / 25 RPD (3.1 Pro)
Capabilities	Vision	Thinking Reasoning
Performance Tier	A-Tier (Excellent)	S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate	Medium	⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size	~1.8T (estimated)	~1.5T (estimated)
Limitations	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency	Data used for training (Unpaid tier) Rate limits are enforced per minute/day No SLA for free tier
Key Strengths	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing	Multimodal Capabilities Huge Context Window (up to 2M tokens) Fast Inference Speed