Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
GPT-OSS 120B
Groq
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
1k RPD, 8k TPM
Pricing Model
Free / Open
TinyLlama
llamafile
Intelligence Score
64/100
Context Window
Local
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
GPT-OSS 120B Wins
With an intelligence score of 65/100 vs 64/100, GPT-OSS 120B outperforms TinyLlama by 1 point.
Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
GPT-OSS 120B
|
TinyLlama
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
1k RPD, 8k TPM | Local |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Proprietary) | Transformer (Open Weight) |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~60-64% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
30 RPM, 14.4k RPD | Hardware dependent |
|
Daily Limit
|
14,400 Requests/Day | Unlimited |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | C-Tier (Good) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
120B | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
Llama Guard 4 12B
TinyLlama
vs
Llama Guard 4 12B
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2
TinyLlama
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2
GPT-OSS 120B
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2 0905
TinyLlama
vs
Moonshot Kimi K2 0905
TinyLlama
vs
GPT-OSS 20B
TinyLlama
vs
GPT-OSS Safeguard 20B
TinyLlama
vs
Qwen3 32B
TinyLlama
vs
Allam 2 7B
TinyLlama
vs
Llama 3.1 8B
TinyLlama
vs
Llama 3.3 70B