Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Grok 2

S-TIER

xAI

Intelligence Score 94/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Commercial/Paid Model

GPT-4o (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 92/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
View Provider Analysis →
FINAL VERDICT

Grok 2 Wins

With an intelligence score of 94/100 vs 92/100, Grok 2 outperforms GPT-4o (via routing) by 2 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Grok 2
GPT-4o (via routing)
Context Window
128K 128K
Architecture
Transformer Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score
~88-91% ~85-87%
Release Date
2024 May-Nov 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
Varies 60 RPM
Daily Limit
Based on tier Credit-based
Capabilities
Function Calling Streaming
Vision
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium Medium
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed ~1.8T (estimated)
Limitations
  • API key required
  • Limited availability
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • Real-time X/Twitter data
  • Strong reasoning
  • Up-to-date
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons

Grok 2
vs
GPT-4o
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o
Grok 2
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o (via Coze)
Grok 2
vs
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Grok-2 Mini
GPT-4o (via routing)
vs
Grok-2 Vision