Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Llama 3.1 70B

A-TIER

Lepton AI

Intelligence Score 87/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 8K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 87/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) Wins

Equal intelligence scores (87/100), but Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) offers a significantly larger context window.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Llama 3.1 70B
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Context Window
8K 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~80-84% ~80-84%
Release Date
Jul 2024 Jul 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 60 RPM
Daily Limit
Credit-based Credit-based
Capabilities
Reasoning
No specific data
Performance Tier
A-Tier (Excellent) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
âš¡ Fast âš¡ Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
70B 70B
Limitations
  • Credits needed for production volume
  • Smaller model selection than aggregators
  • Focus on deployment over just API
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • Standard OpenAI-compatible APIs
  • Deploy custom models with one command
  • High throughput optimization
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons