Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Llama 3 8B Quant

GPT4All

Intelligence Score 71/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window Local
Pricing Model Free / Open

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 87/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 71/100, Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) outperforms Llama 3 8B Quant by 16 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Llama 3.1 70B (via routing).
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Llama 3 8B Quant
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Context Window
Local 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~65-69% ~80-84%
Release Date
2024 Jul 2024
Pricing Model
Free Tier Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
Hardware dependent 60 RPM
Daily Limit
Unlimited Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
C-Tier (Good) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
⚡ Very Fast ⚡ Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
8B 70B
Limitations
  • Slower than GPU inference
  • Limited to supported quantized formats
  • UI is basic
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • LocalDocs: Chat with your files privately
  • Nomic Embed Text: High quality embeddings
  • CPU Optimized (AVX2)
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons