Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Qwen 2.5

LLM7.io

Intelligence Score 65/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 32K

Pricing Model Free / Open

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Grok (xAI)

Intelligence Score 96/100

Context Window 2M

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 96/100 vs 65/100, Grok 4.1 Fast outperforms Qwen 2.5 by 31 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Grok 4.1 Fast.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Qwen 2.5	Grok 4.1 Fast
Context Window	32K	2M
Architecture	Transformer (Open Weight)	Transformer
Est. MMLU Score	~60-64%	~92-95%
Release Date	Sep-Nov 2024	2024
Pricing Model	Free Tier	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	30 RPM (no signup) / 120 RPM (free email token)	Varies (low for free tier)
Daily Limit	Up to 5M tokens/day (rolling 24h, with free token)	Credit-based
Capabilities	No specific data	No specific data
Performance Tier	C-Tier (Good)	S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate	Medium	Medium
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	Undisclosed	Undisclosed
Limitations	No signup tier is heavily rate-limited (30 RPM) Smaller, less well-known provider — verify uptime before production use	$25/month credit cap (generous but finite) Lower rate limits on free tier Vision models have smaller context
Key Strengths	Works with zero signup OpenAI-compatible endpoint — swap base_url + key No signup required for basic use	Monthly renewing $25 free credits OpenAI-compatible API (drop-in replacement) Real-time knowledge from X/Twitter data