Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Qwen 3.8 27B
Cerebras
Intelligence Score
65/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
128K Context
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Grok 4.1 Fast
S-TIERGrok (xAI)
Intelligence Score
96/100
Context Window
2M
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Grok 4.1 Fast Wins
With an intelligence score of 96/100 vs 65/100, Grok 4.1 Fast outperforms Qwen 3.8 27B by 31 points.
Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Grok 4.1 Fast.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Qwen 3.8 27B
|
Grok 4.1 Fast
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
128K Context | 2M |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Open Weight) | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~60-64% | ~92-95% |
|
Release Date
|
2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Free Tier | Paid / Commercial |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
5 RPM, 30K uncached / 90K total TPM, 1M tokens per hour and per day (Free Trial) | Varies (low for free tier) |
|
Daily Limit
|
1M tokens/day | Credit-based |
|
Capabilities
|
No specific data
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
C-Tier (Good) | S-Tier (Elite) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
⚡ Very Fast | Medium |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | General Purpose |
|
Model Size
|
27B | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Qwen 3.8 27B
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct (free)
Qwen 3.8 27B
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct (free)
Qwen 3.8 27B
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen3.8 27B
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen3.5 72B Instruct
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B Instruct
Grok 4.1 Fast
vs
Qwen 2.5 72B