Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Qwen-Plus

A-TIER

Qwen (Alibaba)

Intelligence Score 82/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 32K tokens
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 87/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 82/100, Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) outperforms Qwen-Plus by 5 points.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.
HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Qwen-Plus
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Context Window
32K tokens 128K
Architecture
Transformer (Open Weight) Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~75-79% ~80-84%
Release Date
2024 Jul 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 60 RPM
Daily Limit
Credit-based Credit-based
Capabilities
No specific data
No specific data
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed 70B
Limitations
  • Requires Alibaba Cloud account (Payment method)
  • Dashboard can be complex
  • Region selection matters
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • Qwen Family: Top tier open weights
  • Multimodal capabilities (VL models)
  • Search Plugin integration
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons