Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Solar Pro

Upstage

Intelligence Score 77/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 32K tokens
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)

A-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 87/100
Context Window 128K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 87/100 vs 77/100, Llama 3.1 70B (via routing) outperforms Solar Pro by 10 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Solar Pro
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Context Window
32K tokens 128K
Architecture
Transformer Transformer (Open Weight)
Est. MMLU Score
~70-74% ~80-84%
Release Date
2024 Jul 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 60 RPM
Daily Limit
Credit-based Credit-based
Capabilities
Reasoning
No specific data
Performance Tier
B-Tier (Strong) A-Tier (Excellent)
Speed Estimate
Medium âš¡ Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose General Purpose
Model Size
Undisclosed 70B
Limitations
  • Credits expire after 3 months
  • Focus on document processing
  • Smaller context window (32k)
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths
  • Solar Architecture: Depth-Up-Scaling
  • Specialized in OCR and Document Parse
  • Translation capabilities (KO/EN/JA)
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing

Similar Comparisons