Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Various Open Models

NVIDIA NIM

Intelligence Score 65/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window Context Limited

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100

Context Window 200K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 65/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Various Open Models by 28 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing).

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Various Open Models	Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Context Window	Context Limited	200K
Architecture	Transformer	Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score	~60-64%	~88-91%
Release Date	2024	Jun-Oct 2024
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	40 requests/minute	60 RPM
Daily Limit	-	Credit-based
Capabilities	No specific data	Reasoning
Performance Tier	C-Tier (Good)	S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate	Medium	Medium
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	Undisclosed	Unknown
Limitations	Phone number verification required Free credits are limited Rate limits on free tier	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths	High performance models	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing