Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

DeepSeek-V4 Pro

A-TIER

DeepSeek

Intelligence Score 80/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 128K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100

Context Window 200K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 80/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms DeepSeek-V4 Pro by 13 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	DeepSeek-V4 Pro	Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Context Window	128K	200K
Architecture	Dense Transformer	Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score	~75-79%	~88-91%
Release Date	2024	Jun-Oct 2024
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	60 RPM	60 RPM
Daily Limit	Credit-based	Credit-based
Capabilities	No specific data	Reasoning
Performance Tier	B-Tier (Strong)	S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate	Medium	Medium
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	Undisclosed	Unknown
Limitations	10M tokens is one-time only API can be slow during peak hours (Chinese business hours) Rate limiting during high demand periods	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths	DeepSeek-R1: OpenAI o1-level reasoning (open-source) Mixture-of-Experts architecture for efficiency OpenAI-compatible API (drop-in replacement)	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing