Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 200K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

xAI

Intelligence Score 94/100

Context Window 128K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

Commercial/Paid Model

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 94/100 vs 93/100, Grok 2 outperforms Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) by 1 point.

Close Match: The difference is minimal. Consider other factors like pricing and features.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)	Grok 2
Context Window	200K	128K
Architecture	Transformer (Proprietary)	Transformer
Est. MMLU Score	~88-91%	~88-91%
Release Date	Jun-Oct 2024	2024
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	60 RPM	Varies
Daily Limit	Credit-based	Based on tier
Capabilities	Reasoning	Function Calling Streaming
Performance Tier	S-Tier (Elite)	S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate	Medium	Medium
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	Unknown	Undisclosed
Limitations	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency	API key required Limited availability
Key Strengths	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing	Real-time X/Twitter data Strong reasoning Up-to-date