Battle of the Models
Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
DEPRECATEDRequesty
This model is no longer active/free — kept for reference.
Intelligence Score
93/100
Model Popularity
0 votes
Context Window
200K
Pricing Model
Commercial / Paid
Step 3.7 Flash
A-TIERRouteway
Intelligence Score
83/100
Context Window
See provider
Pricing Model
Free / Open
Model Popularity
0 votes
FINAL VERDICT
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins
With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 83/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Step 3.7 Flash by 10 points.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
|
Step 3.7 Flash
|
|---|---|---|
|
Context Window
|
200K | See provider |
|
Architecture
|
Transformer (Proprietary) | Transformer |
|
Est. MMLU Score
|
~88-91% | ~75-79% |
|
Release Date
|
Jun-Oct 2024 | 2024 |
|
Pricing Model
|
Paid / Commercial | Free Tier |
|
Rate Limit (RPM)
|
60 RPM | 5 RPM (community submission) |
|
Daily Limit
|
50 requests/day (new orgs) / 200 requests/day (paying orgs), shared across all free models | 200 requests/day |
|
Capabilities
|
Reasoning
|
No specific data
|
|
Performance Tier
|
S-Tier (Elite) | B-Tier (Strong) |
|
Speed Estimate
|
Medium | ⚡ Very Fast |
|
Primary Use Case
|
General Purpose | ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps |
|
Model Size
|
Unknown | Undisclosed |
|
Limitations
|
|
|
|
Key Strengths
|
|
|
Similar Comparisons
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
GPT-4o (via routing)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Llama 3.1 70B (via routing)
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
vs
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Poolside Laguna XS.2
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Poolside Laguna M.1
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
GPT OSS 120B
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Laguna XS.2
Step 3.7 Flash
vs
Gemma 4 31B