Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

No matches found
VS
No matches found

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)

DEPRECATED

Requesty

This model is no longer active/free — kept for reference.

Intelligence Score 93/100
Model Popularity 0 votes
Context Window 200K
Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Step 3.7 Flash

A-TIER

Routeway

Intelligence Score 83/100
Context Window See provider
Pricing Model Free / Open
Model Popularity 0 votes
FINAL VERDICT

Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) Wins

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 83/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Step 3.7 Flash by 10 points.

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Detailed Comparison

Feature
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Step 3.7 Flash
Context Window
200K See provider
Architecture
Transformer (Proprietary) Transformer
Est. MMLU Score
~88-91% ~75-79%
Release Date
Jun-Oct 2024 2024
Pricing Model
Paid / Commercial Free Tier
Rate Limit (RPM)
60 RPM 5 RPM (community submission)
Daily Limit
50 requests/day (new orgs) / 200 requests/day (paying orgs), shared across all free models 200 requests/day
Capabilities
Reasoning
No specific data
Performance Tier
S-Tier (Elite) B-Tier (Strong)
Speed Estimate
Medium ⚡ Very Fast
Primary Use Case
General Purpose ⚡ Fast Chat & Apps
Model Size
Unknown Undisclosed
Limitations
  • Requires underlying provider API keys
  • Free credit amount is limited
  • Routing adds minimal latency
  • Free capacity and limits can change; verify on the provider site
  • Listed from community submissions - partly verified
Key Strengths
  • AI Router: automatic provider failover
  • Prompt caching for cost savings
  • Multi-provider load balancing
  • OpenAI-compatible API
  • Multi-model access

Similar Comparisons