Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Solar Pro

Upstage

Intelligence Score 77/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 32K tokens

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100

Context Window 200K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 77/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Solar Pro by 16 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing).

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Solar Pro	Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Context Window	32K tokens	200K
Architecture	Transformer	Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score	~70-74%	~88-91%
Release Date	2024	Jun-Oct 2024
Pricing Model	Paid / Commercial	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	60 RPM	60 RPM
Daily Limit	Credit-based	Credit-based
Capabilities	Reasoning	Reasoning
Performance Tier	B-Tier (Strong)	S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate	Medium	Medium
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	Undisclosed	Unknown
Limitations	Credits expire after 3 months Focus on document processing Smaller context window (32k)	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths	Solar Architecture: Depth-Up-Scaling Specialized in OCR and Document Parse Translation capabilities (KO/EN/JA)	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing