Battle of the Models

Compare specific LLM models, context windows, and capabilities.

Dolphin Mixtral

Venice.ai

Intelligence Score 65/100

Model Popularity 0 votes

Context Window 32K tokens

Pricing Model Free / Open

View Provider Analysis →

S-TIER

Requesty

Intelligence Score 93/100

Context Window 200K

Pricing Model Commercial / Paid

Model Popularity 0 votes

View Provider Analysis →

FINAL VERDICT

With an intelligence score of 93/100 vs 65/100, Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing) outperforms Dolphin Mixtral by 28 points.

Clear Winner: Significant performance advantage for Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing).

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Feature	Dolphin Mixtral	Claude 3.5 Sonnet (via routing)
Context Window	32K tokens	200K
Architecture	Mixture of Experts (MoE)	Transformer (Proprietary)
Est. MMLU Score	~60-64%	~88-91%
Release Date	2024	Jun-Oct 2024
Pricing Model	Free Tier	Paid / Commercial
Rate Limit (RPM)	10 RPM (free tier)	60 RPM
Daily Limit	Limited daily usage	Credit-based
Capabilities	No specific data	Reasoning
Performance Tier	C-Tier (Good)	S-Tier (Elite)
Speed Estimate	Medium	Medium
Primary Use Case	General Purpose	General Purpose
Model Size	Undisclosed	Unknown
Limitations	Free tier has speed/rate limits Pro subscription needed for 405B speed Decentralized network variance	Requires underlying provider API keys Free credit amount is limited Routing adds minimal latency
Key Strengths	Zero-Knowledge Proofs for privacy Uncensored model options Decentralized compute network	AI Router: automatic provider failover Prompt caching for cost savings Multi-provider load balancing